Sunday 8 March 2020

WHY AMERICA NEVER CHOOSES A WOMAN PRESIDENT?



Civilization took birth in India, Egypt, China and then spread to the west. The Americas were discovered only other day by Christopher Columbus and are hence called the new world. The ruins of Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro, the teaching institutions of Takshila and Nalanda, the art in the caves of Ajanta, the sculptures and the architectural wizardry of the Kailasa temple in Ellora and the Sphinx of Egypt, the relics of Han civilization in China all stand testimony to the rich history and civilization of the East. Varanasi remains the most ancient living city and Hinduism the most ancient religion. When you compare this heritage to what the West and the new world has to offer you know how incomparable they are. We, the descendants of this civilization may not have lived up to it of late, and fallen back on developmental milestones that matter today but civilization once acquired cannot be lost. It is passed on from one generation to the next and its essence is never lost and lasts forever.

Both in Hindu and in Greek mythology there have been countless Goddesses who have been worshiped. Right from historical times women have enjoyed a pride position in our societies and have been unhesitatingly accepted as leaders in all spheres of life. Whether it was Rani Laxmibai or Rani Padmini or Rani Chennamma or Razia Sultana or Begum Hazrat Mahal, we, both men and women, had unquestionably accepted them as leaders and they never disappointed by their bravery and courage. Similarly Cleopatra VII ruled ancient Egypt as co-regent (first with her father, then with her two younger brothers and finally with her son) for almost three decades. She was part of a dynasty of Macedonian rulers founded by Ptolemy and an undisputed leader.

In recent times we have had great women leaders like Indira Gandhi in India, Benazir Bhutto in Pakistan, Sirimavo Bandernayeke and Chandrika Kumaratunga in Sri Lanka, Khalida Zia and Shekh Hasina in Bangladesh, Soong Ching-ling in China, Corazon Aquino in Philippines, Golda Maira in Israel and Tsai Ing Wen in Taiwan who made a mark in public life and served their countrymen with distinction.

Europe though had the once mighty British Empire ruled ceremonially by Queen Victoria and Queen Elizabeth but took a very long time to accept a woman political leader in Margaret Thatcher and later in the German Chancellor Angela Merkel. Once again they ruled almost unchallenged and with great distinction to steer their economy out of the woods. Julia Gillard was a very efficient leader of Australia and now off course we have Jackinda Ardern in New Zealand, Sanna Marin in Finland and at least in ten other nations in the world today. So women undoubtedly can be very efficient, able and caring when they are at the helm and democracies have repeatedly chosen them to lead. Even the Inca and Moche civilization in South America again had many examples of female warriors and high priestesses who ruled their land in the past and so Peru, Bolivia, Chile and Argentina have had female Presidents.

So now with this background I pose my question - why is the United States of America not prepared to choose a woman President? Whether you liked her or not, you cannot deny that Hillary Clinton was immensely qualified. So was the Massachusetts senator and former Harvard law professor Elizabeth Warren, who threw in her towel in favour of Joe Biden recently.  An excellent orator, with a brilliant track record as a Senator, why did she fail to make the mark? Why do you think this blatant practice of sexism is celebrated in America?

This is where civilization comes in. It is a new world they do not have a history of trusting women with leadership roles. They gave voting rights to women only the other day! Women's suffrage in the United States of America, the legal right of women to vote, was established over the course of more than half a century, first in various states and localities, sometimes on a limited basis, and then nationally in 1920. The demand for women's suffrage began to gather strength in the 1840s, but the country chose to ignore and suppress it till 1920.

There have been many famous women in all spheres in America – science, art, medicine, culture, films, media, sports, military and space but before Nancy Pelosi and Hillary Clinton they have no history of political leadership of some stature by women and when even they fail to break he glass ceiling Americans will still continue to ignore 50% of their precious human resource while choosing their President.  And we still call it a developed country!

Regardless of their social and political status and their individual culture's values, women everywhere have led active lives. They have worked to bear and raise children; to produce food and contribute to the household and social economy; to participate in the decision making of their society; and to be major practitioners of spiritual rites. The contributions of women to ancient civilizations continue to have an impact on women's lives today.

The United States of America which supports other countries to protect human rights, build international relations, avoid gender discrimination and achieve economic development. Surprisingly, a country where more than 50 percent of population is woman has never elected a female president. This issue constantly draws attention because from the first presidential elections in 1789 to present, Americans have always distrusted woman candidate.
The history of Native Americans demonstrates a huge division between the roles of males and females. Even after the foundation of the US Constitution, legal gender discrimination took place. For example, founder women were excluded from the list of Founding Fathers. Founding Fathers, the use of masculine pronouns ‘he’ and ‘his’ in the US Constitution, extension of the deadline of ERA’s ratification and pregnancy discrimination, which still remains impeding factor for American women. Then again men are more interested in politics than women and this is fundamental reason of women’s under-representation in politics, but this is a world wide phenomenan. Male candidates routinely out-poll and routinely raise more funds to run their campaigns than women do
This risk-averseness is compounded by mainstream American media, which reflects the internalized misogyny of the public. Not only does cable news pay an disproportionate amount of attention to the white, male candidates, ensuring they stay high in the polls but print and digital media reporters too are equally guilty. In a recent study found, tend to describe them more positively. The Northeastern University School of Journalism analyzed 200 articles, focusing on the five most-read news websites according to Amazon's Alexa: The Washington Post, The New York Times, HuffPo, CNN, and Fox News. Researchers looked at the percentage of positive words used to describe 2020 presidential candidates. The candidates by media sentiment from highest to lowest, were: Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Cory Booker, Beto O'Rourke, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Sen. Amy Klobuchar, Sen. Kamala Harris, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand. The pattern here is unmistakable. Sen. Bernie Sanders even went on to say “Anybody knows me knows that it’s incomprehensible that I would think that a woman cannot be president of the United States.”

So, America will not have a woman President in near future because this is a civilization thing.

No comments:

Post a Comment