Young people at the recent
Jantar Mantar protest (primarily the CJP-led agitation over NEET and other exam
paper leaks, irregularities, and demands for accountability including the
Education Minister’s resignation) used abusive and foul language for a mix of
generational, technological, psychological, and situational reasons. This
harmed the optics of an otherwise legitimate grievance even as other Gen Z
participants actively pushed back against it.
The protest drew large numbers
of students and young people (often described as a “Gen Z revolution”), with
creative placards, memes, satire, and genuine anger over repeated systemic
failures that affect futures and trust in institutions. Police action on key
days (including the July 20 march attempts) escalated tensions, injuries
occurred on both sides, and the site saw both disciplined volunteering
(cleanliness drives, medical help, human chains) and disruption (abusive
slogans, hooliganism, near-lynching of a media person in one reported
incident). Organizers and many participants themselves publicly urged against
vulgarity, noting it undercut the cause.
Anger and
Conflict resolution skills are
imbibed in childhood. It is not uncommon for adolescents to revolt against
parents, who appear to them as species from alien planet. A gradual drip of
acrimony turns into a bitter and unforgiving swamp causing a fossilization, or
worse, death of their relationship. An ever changing world appeals to
adolescents whereas parents often hold on to their experiences, beliefs and
patterns. Revolting adolescents never react to just the moment, but to a
'story' they have told themselves several times about how low opinion their
parents have of them! They dust an old ledger of unresolved arguments and
grievances in their defense, using it to suppress guilt and rationalize.
When these children hit the
streets for genuine grievances, instead of coherently speaking their mind they
end up angry, giving emotional and volatile arguments, often ending in filthy
abuses and violence. They feel that their parents, the government, the
Judiciary, the police, the media all are conspiring against them. Little do
they understand that violence, whether physical or verbal, is counterproductive
to their cause?
The emotionally disgruntled and verbally irresponsible youngsters who yell back at a version of parents at
home, who actually do not exist, are the ones who were hurling abuses at the
authorities and indulging in violence in the streets. While parents can be all
forgiving, it is good to see the government too trying to be the same. But
physical and verbal violence and loss of public property and life can not go
unpublished.
Why the foul language?
Several overlapping factors
explain it:
Social media and cultural normalization: Gen Z language is heavily shaped by Instagram, reels, memes, group chats, and stand-up comedy, where expletives, shock value, and irreverence are routine for engagement and “authenticity.” The boundary between private/peer speech and public speech has eroded. What once stayed in closed circles spills into streets. Virality rewards the extreme; a shocking slogan or misogynistic taunt travels farther than measured critique.
Anger + crowd psychology: Deep frustration over paper leaks, perceived
unaccountable institutions, limited opportunities, and (for some) heavy-handed
policing produced raw expression. In large crowds, individual restraint weakens.
This is classic crowd dynamics. A section becomes impatient and theatrical;
others try to hold the line. Some anti-social elements can amplify this.
Generational style of dissent: Earlier Indian protest cultures often prized
moral high ground, restraint, and formal slogans (Gandhian or JP-style
discipline). This cohort prioritizes immediacy, satire, ridicule, and refusal
of deference. Humour and memes (“Kuchupuchu resign kar do” style baby-talk
mockery, Hinglish one-liners) are effective tools, but they easily slide into personal
abuse and patriarchal ‘gaalis’ that target women of the opponent’s
family—ironically recycling the very language many claim to reject. Young women
using such terms was particularly noted and debated as either subversive
reclamation or a failure to invent better vocabulary.
Lack of understanding of the
context: Many of those hurling abuses
at the Prime Minister and CJI had no clue about what they were angry about.
They could not coherently rattle down their grievances. Lack of substantive
understanding was compensated by string of abuses. If the Gen-z thinks that
this makes them look cool, they have to think again. It makes them look hollow.
They at once lose the sympathy of the masses.
Performance and identity: For some it signals group belonging, toughness,
or fearlessness online-to-offline. The same digital habits that enable rapid
mobilization also import online toxicity and “mind virus” escalation once the
first cheers for an expletive land.
Not every young protester did
this—many explicitly rejected it and focused on constructive work—but the
visible minority dominated coverage and damaged broader sympathy.
How to address it in future
Abusive language is not
inevitable, nor is it effective long-term. Successful movements (JP movement,
earlier student agitations, Gandhi’s campaigns) understood that moral
legitimacy and discipline protect the cause from being dismissed as mere
hooliganism. There are a few practical steps that can be taken:
Internal norms and leadership
organizers: Protest leadership must set
and enforce clear codes early—volunteer stewards, stage announcements against
personal abuse, and rapid distancing from violence or pure invective.
Self-policing by participants (as some did at Jantar Mantar) is more powerful
than external lectures. Channel energy into the creative strengths already on
display: satire, art, memes, documentation, mutual aid.
Civic and media literacy: Schools, colleges, and civil society can teach
the difference between private venting and public persuasion, the history of
effective non-violent discipline, and how optics shape outcomes. Young people
already innovate linguistically; the goal is expanding the repertoire of sharp,
witty, non-degrading dissent rather than moralizing away anger.
Root causes matter: Persistent unaddressed grievances (exam integrity,
employment, institutional trust) keep the pressure cooker hot. Dialogue,
visible reforms, and lower reliance on force reduce the fuel for explosive
expression. Governments and institutions that treat youth concerns as
legitimate lower the temperature.
Broader culture: Parents, educators, and media model the public
language they want to see. Algorithmic amplification of extremes is a
structural problem; rewarding substance over pure shock helps. Stand-up and
online culture will continue normalizing coarse speech, but public political
spaces can still maintain higher standards without sanitizing dissent.
Conflict resolution within a
family
It all starts within the
family, and conflict resolution between siblings and with other family members
sets the tone for future. Parents can do a lot towards this end:
1. Defining rules and boundaries for
arguments
Arguments are an inseparable
part of relationships, regardless of whether they are between spouses, parents
and children, or even siblings, so it is important for everyone to know what is
expected of them during an argument. These rules and advice are valid for
almost any argument or dispute ranging from fights over toys, through problems
of adolescence to the relationship between child and parent and even between
parent and parent. The basic rules for debate are:
(a) Do not insult - you can disagree or be angry without using words or behavior that hurt.
(b) Respect each other - after all, we are a family, one that loves all its members.
(c) Stay calm - communicate with each other in a calm, slow, honest and clear manner.
(d) Listen without interrupting - listen to each other without planning your response while listening.
2. Encouraging creativity
Once both sides in the
argument know what they want and are fighting for it, then any conflict can turn
into one big misunderstanding with each side "stuck" in their
position. However, what if both sides will ultimately agree on the same things
but chose to fight the whole way to a solution? As parents, you must encourage
creative or unique ways to bridge the gap and reach a solution. Encourage
fairness and full transparency, but teach them to recognize that the solution
might not be for the benefit of all parties.
3. Compromise and inclusion
Not everyone gets what they
want when they want, but families can work on it so that everyone is satisfied;
Not perfectly, but in a way that’s acceptable to all. Try to see the situation
from the perspective of someone else in the family so you can at least try to
figure out what it is that they’re feeling. When it comes to quarrels between
siblings, this responsibility will be on the older one, and it is highly
commendable for them if they fill it. In addition, teach your children to show
empathy for others, and it will serve them faithfully in the future as well.
Children who are exposed to compromise-based actions often become ambassadors
of peace in their social circles, and in the future in the professions of their
choosing.
4. Being mindful of the time and
place
During an argument, it is
important to remember the beautiful saying that if you have nothing nice to
say, doesn’t say anything at all. In addition, there may be moments when one
side of the conflict is very angry and cannot speak logically. In such a case,
a break is necessary - step aside and agree to disagree, or to talk about it
later. We all know someone or remember a situation in which one of the sides in
the argument continued to escalate the situation and everything got out of
control. To prevent this, we as parents should convey the message that it is
okay to postpone arguments, the sun will rise tomorrow morning and all involved
will continue to be members of the same family. Perhaps the debate will be no
more important or than tomorrow, but it is better than exacerbating the current
situation.
5. Expressing oneself clearly
In resolving conflicts, it is
important that we not only listen to the person in front of us and try to
understand their position, but also that we know how to express clearly what we
feel. Therefore, you must learn to clearly share what you’re experiencing
within you because people can’t give you what you want if you do not tell them
clearly what it is. Small children usually have difficulty with this process,
but if you help them do so, the situation will improve to the point where your
help will no longer be needed.
6. Seek a solution to a problem that
both sides will benefit from
In order to be able to meet
this principle, I recommend that at the stage of finding solutions, you be
careful about two rules:
(i)
Try to find a solution that
both sides are satisfied with
(ii)
Propose as many solutions and
alternatives as possible, so that there isn’t just one solution on the table.
The purpose of this tool is
for each side to understand and agree on the solution and leave with the
feeling that there is a way forward. So, keep in mind the following three
points:
(a) Both sides need to understand beyond a shadow of a doubt what the agreed solution is.
(b) Both sides must commit themselves to fulfill their promises in favor of the solution.
(c) Both sides need to think of ways to prevent this conflict, or others like it, from recurring in the future.
7. Open and sincere communication is
always the solution
Open and honest communication
is no longer a hollow cliché, it is the way to solve conflicts, at both high
and low levels. It is enough to look at the news and see how conflict
resolution between countries is very similar to children learning to play
together. Like countries, small children say everything they think, want and
feel without filters, and often they do not understand the other side. On the
other hand, most of us understand that we will not always get what we want, and
we must also know how to lose and give in from time to time. The question is
only, what do we do with this knowledge? Will we cry and complain every time we
have to face a loss or compromise? The likelihood of this is not high.
Therefore, even within the family unit, it is important to remember and remind
ourselves that only through creative thinking, interpersonal communication, and
an honest and positive approach can we reach a solution to conflicts.
If we choose to conceal
information and not share our feelings, thoughts, and desires in a transparent
and honest way, we will never reach an agreement on both the personal and
family level. At no stage I am suggesting that those protesters who were incoherent, who lacked substance, and who were abusive, vulgar and angry, instead of calm, cool, collected and coherent did not have healthy parenting, but, did their parents feel proud of their gutter language the uttered on the streets? I don't think so.
Genuine anger over real failures deserves
hearing. Turning that anger into disciplined, creative, non-degrading pressure
is both more strategic and more consistent with the better instincts many young
participants already showed. Future movements will be stronger if they treat
civility and focus as strategic assets rather than optional extras.








