It is a red letter day today. Sri
Ram Chandra, the king of Ayodhya, who lives in the heart of every person of
Indian origin all over the world, is going to have his own abode in his birth
place in Ayodhya. The Prime Minister of India, Mr. Narendra Modi, who was the
grand planner of Lal Kriahna Advani's highly publicized and politically
invigorating Rath Yatra and the Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Sri Yogi
Adityanath, whose Guru, Mahant Avaidyanath was the nerve centre of Mandir
agitation have come together to fulfill a long cherished dream of every Indian.
Ayodhya is to Hinduism what Vatican
is to Christianity and Mecca is to Islam. Still Ayodhya was left abandoned by
successive governments even after seven decades of independence! An Uzbek invading
army of Babur in 1528 plundered the Hindu heartland, destroyed a temple in the
birth place of Lord Ram and strategically constructed a mosque in 1529 to
announce their supremacy and inception of their Mughal Empire. This was
expected of them because by doing so they attempted to hurt the faith of the
vanquished and demoralized them so that they can present themselves as larger
than life. If they can destroy Ram they must be mighty and should not be
challenged. The destruction of this and many subsequent temples had the desired
effect and a predominantly Hindu land remained under Muslim and subsequently
British subjugation for almost the next four centuries.
The vanquished do not have the
privilege of writing the history and so first the British and then the left and
left of centre Indian historians converted Ram into a mythological figure and
despite the fact that his family tree can be traced right up to King Ikshwaku,
his earliest ancestor, his very presence on earth was challenged. So naturally
Ayodhya had no hope of resurrection.
We were told that Kalidasa was Shakespeare of
India though Kalidasa was born centuries before Shakespeare. We were told
Chanakya was India’s Machiavelli though he mastered the statecraft thousands of
years earlier. And we accepted it because we were the vanquished. The only
thing the British historians found in our history was caste system.I do not blame the British for glamorizing the British
rule and tarnishing our past but why did Indian historians not do a course
correction? They did not because they believed if they can erase the pre Mughal
history of India and highlight only the achievements of the Muslim rulers and
brush their misdeeds under the carpet they will create a more 'secular' India
despite overwhelming Hindu predominance. Muslim
invaders destroyed universities, temples and knowledge system structured around
them and our sense of self-esteem by destroying our centres of faith, our idols.
The official records tell us that even after burning the Nalanda University and
destroying Taxila and Vikramshila, burning libraries of temples even today, we
are left with 3 million manuscripts in Sanskrit, Pali and Prakrit! Imagine the
richness of our civilization! Our Marxist historians conveniently forgot to
tell us about these misdeeds. We were told that India was never a nation
but British had made it into a nation and Nehru ji was trying to create a new
idea of India, so we can stay united. With this single argument, we were
trained to forget our entire knowledge-based heritage that has at least 8,000
years of documented history. The historians were hand in glove with
the rulers of independent India who had a long term plan. They sneaked in the
term 'secularism' in the preamble of our constitution.
India has been secular since time
immemorial. A Hindu considers the world to be his family by the virtue of
'Vasudhaiva kutumakam'. This is a verse which appears in Chapter VI of Maha
Upanishad, composed somewhere between 500 CE and 1000 CE. India is secular not because of her
constitution but because every Hindu mother tells her children the virtues of
all religions and teaches them to bow or fold hands in front of a mazaar, a
mosque, a church and a temple without distinction. We are not just
constitutionally secular but culturally secular. So why was a change in the
constitution done? To create a division in the Hindu vote bank into secular and
non-secular, an old British trick of divide and rule! The appeasement of the
minority was so profound that giving back Ayodhya its lost glory was considered
clearly non-secular.
What the post British rulers forgot
was that faith never dies. When 4 centuries of foreign oppression could not
eliminate our faith how could 6 decades of their divisive politics succeed in
doing so. In 2014 faith prevailed and the so called 'seculars' were dumped into
the oblivion of history. A court case resulted in a unanimous decision in
favour of temple construction and people of all religion accepted the verdict
with grace, dignity and tolerance. By debating about the existence of Ram,
whose life and time is celebrated in the entire South Asia from Philippines to
Indonesia, in Japan, Korea and China and wherever the Indian Diaspora migrated,
we had become the laughing stock of the world. It needed the overwhelming will
of the people of this great land to give Lord Ram his rightful abode, not only
in our hearts, a place he never left, but also in Ayodhya.
By performing the Bhumi Puja of the
much awaited Ram temple in Ayodhya the Prime Minister is, on behalf of all Indians, apologizing to the Lord for his exile of nearly 500 years from his abode in
Ayodhya and assuring Indians and the Indian Diaspora that Ayodhya will regain
its lost glory in near future. The temple is just the beginning and faith will
always prevail over politics.
August 5, 2020 will remain a red
letter day not only because the Ram temple started taking shape in Ram's birth
place or janmabhoomi but also because
this was the day we snatched the pen out of the hand of the British and Marxist
historians to rewrite our own history. By decolonizing the minds of our fellow
countrymen we hope to restore in their minds and hearts the pride of our
glorious and ancient civilization. A country can never prosper if it her people
are not proud of her history, her culture and her civilization. The
construction of the Ram temple in Ayodhya is the first step of that sacred
journey – our teerth yatra towards
rediscovering our pride!
wonderfully put Sir.
ReplyDeleteFor Nehruvian scholars who say "there was no India before the Britishers & 1947?
1. What was the British East India Company registered with the name "India" in 1602 in London? Dutch East India Company was also registered the same time.
2. Columbus set sail for "India". Why else did the land he reached get the name West "Indies?" Was he searching for some Dodoland?
Wonderfully written Surajitda who better than you to write such a masterful piece our newer generations need to be educated and the past glory must be highlighted in the correct history which needs to be written.a famous dialogue of a Egyptian pharaoh "So shall be said so shall be written and so shall be done". Let's celebrate the new dawn of the new era
ReplyDeleteIt got posted as unknown Dr Mahesh Prabhu
ReplyDeleteSuperb insights Sir! If we don't respect our own culture and reclaim it, who will?
ReplyDeleteTruly a red letter day!
Your comment was posted as unknown. Please write your name.
DeleteSuperb write up and rightly penned down .
ReplyDeleteYour comment was posted as unknown. Please write your name.
DeleteHari Om. Tat Sat.
ReplyDeleteA major civilisation re-claims her lost heritage. A home gets its Kul-devata back in the pooja room. Time to rise and shine again.
ReplyDeleteTrue independence day for Hindus
ReplyDeleteYour comment was posted as unknown. Please write your name.
DeleteWonderfully written. Really it's a great day for all Indians
ReplyDeleteThis article proves that pen is mightier than politics. May the tribe of independent historians and honest journalists increase!
ReplyDeleteCheers,
Prof. G. Surender Reddy
A Proud Indian
So well written. Needs to be elaborated in book form. All the best. Jai Shree Ram!
ReplyDeleteBeautifully articulated. Thank you for sharing your wisdom.
ReplyDeleteSo nicely written but every sensible indian should stand up and carry the same vision , a vision of self respect for his religion and culture.
ReplyDeleteYour comment was posted as unknown. Please write your name.
DeleteSuch words imbibe proud and respect for our land, culture and History. Ayodhaya stated as land of devtas in our veda and today we have taken one step towards its independence
ReplyDeleteYour comment was posted as unknown. Please write your name.
DeleteU wrote like a staunch historian. Congratulations. Will like more from you.
ReplyDeleteHeartiest congratulations for a very thought provoking article. An oppressed nation / civilisation can regain its lost glory only if it does not forget its history, its achievements, the culture, traditions, the mistakes made in the past etc.
ReplyDeleteEvery Indian must read Swatantryaveer Savarkar's last book 'भारतीय इतिहासातील सहा सोनेरी पाने'. It is also translated in English and titled as 'Six Glorious Epochs of Indian History'.
Congratulations again and wish you all the very best.
Vaibhav Joglekar
Savarkar was one of the few who challenged the British version of Indian history. The history of India, written by British authors was, in a nutshell, as follows:
DeleteUntil the invasion of India by Alexander the Great, there was nothing worth mentioning in India. After Alexander, the Greeks taught civilization to Indians, and gave them the Western ideas. Then came the Shakas, Huns, Kushans etc.
They also kept teaching the natives.
In the eighth century Mohammed bin Kasim invaded India. It marked the beginning of the Muslim rule.
Then came the Ghazanvis, Ghoris, Gulams, Turks, Afgans, Khiljis, Tughalaqs, Lodis and Mughals. They were very brave and noble. They carried out reforms after reforms.
Lastly came the English. They could not tolerate the prevailing anarchy. 'We rule India' they said. Some kings accepted their protection. Those who resisted, collapsed like a deck of cards.
The British taught peace (like the once demonstrated at Jalliawala bagh) and prosperity to this troubled land. Under them everyone was happy. They introduced rule of law which Indians never knew before.
Thus the history of India (according to the British) is as dark as coaltar. There is nothing in it to be proud of. It is natural that only foreigners should rule India. The best the natives can do is to serve theBritish by becoming their obedient servants.
I have no problems with the British. They were writing the history of the vanquished. But why did we not re-write the correct history after 1947?