Doctors are putting everything on the line. They're walking into a wildfire of a pandemic, often facing hostile or depressed patients and anxious and agitated relatives with professional calm and dexterity. That takes a monumental amount of courage and deserves profound respect. I and my tribe are there as reserves because we have been told that ‘they also help who stand and wait’.
“Am I doing the right thing?” This is a question which I have
been asking myself time and time again in the last two weeks. I am a Plastic
Surgeon and so barring occasions like trauma and vascular injury my job is
considered “non-essential”, and as per the instructions of the government all
non-essential surgical services should be postponed till the time we are sure
we have seen the end of this prevailing COVID19 pandemic. And it is from this
decision of choosing what is essential and what is a non-essential, stems out
my moral dilemma.
Why is the breast lump which I saw the other day and diagnosed
as a early breast cancer in a 35 year old mother of two not essential? Am I
morally correct in postponing her surgery? Why is the surgery of 18 month old
child with Cleft Palate non essential when I know that if I postpone her
surgery she may never get a normal speech all her life? So you can appreciate
how thin and barely indistinguishable this line between essential and
non-essential is……..and still I and many other doctors are searching for it all
the time.
Doctors routinely are finding it difficult to provide the kind
of care they know their patients need. If we choose not to see patients during
the lockdown we are cowards and if we do see them despite all odds then we are
greedy and irresponsible. And God forbid, if one of our patients turns out to
be COVID positive and we are picked up on contact tracing, then we are
considered criminally negligent!
We have a deeply held moral belief of putting our patients
first. It truly has very little to do with the oath we took and much more to do
with the holy ambers of professionalism in which we were tempered. In the midst
of the COVID-19 pandemic, the same belief has morphed and magnified, joined by
new threats that come with severely constrained resources. It will be more
critical than ever for administrators and clinicians to work together during
this time to assess resources, to manage those that are limited, and to face
the profound risks attendant in this rapidly evolving environment. COVID
patients are a priority no doubt, but all non-COVID patients cannot afford to
wait. This is time to show leadership. It is time to find a way. Failure to
work together may leave a generation of clinicians doubting and distrustful of
the moral fabric of our healthcare system and its leadership.
At no stage am I suggesting that all elective surgeries should
be thrown open. Doctors in the U.S. watched, fearing that a tsunami of patients
would overwhelm their healthcare systems, preventing them from adequately
caring for the ill or managing their own substantial risk. Despite clear
evidence of a pathogenic wildfire tearing through China and Italy, consuming
personal protective equipment (PPE) at unprecedented rates, many US hospitals
continued to perform elective procedures—burning through PPE that would soon be
critical to protect healthcare workers—for weeks after the first alarms
sounded. And today they are repenting their decision. Only a few weeks into the
US spread, but fully 4 months after the disease appeared in China, the dire
straits of many US hospitals, and their failure to adequately prepare, is
becoming clear.
We don’t want to see hospitals in India run out, of masks, face
shields, and respirators. This represents an untenable situation for doctors.
Patients will be in desperate need of doctors and doctors will face
unacceptably high risk to care for them. Both corporate hospitals and small and
medium size hospitals know that elective surgeries are the cornerstone of our
hospital system's operating model—and the negative impact due to the
cancellations of these procedures cannot be overstated. With elective
procedures and all nonessential patient visits canceled indefinitely, many
hospitals are probably worried whether their systems would
survive the pandemic.
Hospitals are not simply places of treatment; they are also
avenues of employment for many. A hospital with its doors shut is like a
dilapidated temple abandoned by both God and His/Her worshippers. The self employed doctors, who usually own these hospitals, have to pay all the bills, all the salaries, all the bank loan installments but keep their hospitals closed! While there are no avenues of earning, their expenditure has only marginally come down. Prolong lockdown
can result in loss of jobs because most of these hospitals run on narrow
margins of profit. Again they confront another dilemma whom to retain and whom to
let go? Technical excellence, position in the scale of usefulness and personal
preferences will be called into play to make these ugly choices, further
difficult.
Protecting the workforce is vital. Skilled, experienced
professionals and support staff are the most valuable asset that any
institution possesses. Losing them to COVID-19, whether for the short term or
the long term—through death or disillusionment—will take a terrible toll. Doing
whatever it takes to keep them safe must be a priority.
So both as a clinician and as an employer a doctor today
standing at a crucial crossroad. His/her loyalty to the nation keeps him/her
home but the physician in him knows that all the surgeries he is postponing is
not non-essential, and deep in his heart he is a worried man. Add to this the
prospect of economic decline and if the lockdown continues then even losing his
trusted skilled helping hands. Today we are a worried bunch of doctors.
You've outlined well the horns of the dilemma that a doctor, specially a private practitioner, is caught in.
ReplyDelete