Thursday 21 January 2016

HISTORY BOOKS ARE NOT SERVING THEIR PURPOSE


If Lord Macaulay set out to create a class of persons who were Indian in blood and colour, but English in taste, in opinions, in morals, and in intellect I have no doubt in my mind that he is smiling in his grave. Our history books that are taught in our schools have seen to it that his dream comes true.

Why do you think is history taught to children all over the world? It is done to instill a sense of national pride and honor. Whether it is the United States, Great Britain, France, Russia, Germany or China, this is certainly the case today and has been so as long as these countries have existed as modern nations. The lives of their great leaders, particularly the founders of their country are highlighted, the continuity of the nation’s history is emphasized, and the importance of the nation in the history of the world and the greatness of the national culture are stressed. Students are expected to come away from reading accounts of their history with a sense of national pride, greatness and purpose, not only for the past but also for the future.

In India however we see a strange phenomenon. Written by the British, who ruled for 200 years or the Left and Left of Centre Thinkdom (LLCT remember!) our history books are nothing but apologetic about our glorious Hindu cultures and traditions. These historians have largely kept intact the British approach to Indian history devised in the colonial era. History books in India try to ignore the dominant Hindu ethos of the country and its history before the Islamic period. India’s greatest historical and cultural document, the Mahabharata, is hardly given any attention in the schools. So too, the Vedas, Ramayana, Puranas, Buddhist Jatakas and other prime historical and cultural documents of the country are ignored because of their religious overtones. If our history books do address India as a nation, it is only India of the independence movement that they acknowledge, as if prior to 1947 India did not really exist. While Nehru is made important, despite his political defeat in Kashmir and military defeat in the Indo-China war, older kings from the Rig Vedic Bharatas to Yudishthira of the Mahabharata period to the Marathas of the eighteenth century, the Chandraguptas and the Vikramadityas are hardly mentioned. There is no real sense of any historical continuity to the culture, much less to the country. While Mahatma Gandhi is emphasized, the greater spiritual traditions of India and its great teachers from the Vedic rishis, Vedantic, Buddhist and Jain sages to modern savants like Sri Rama Krishna Paramhansa, Sri Aurobindo and Guru Nanak are not given much attention.

What is even worse is that textbooks in Marxist ruled states of India like Bengal and Kerala leave their students with a sense of the greatness of communism and communist countries like China or even Russia which is no longer communist, rather than any real regard for India and its great traditions. The fact of the matter is that Marxism and communism in India were largely anti-national movements. Marxists in India sided with China against India during the Indo-Chinese war of 1962 and raised no criticism of China for its attack. They sided with the British during the independence movement. As against this, communism in Russia, China and Vietnam were part of larger nationalistic movements. This is because Indian Marxists came mainly from a British Marxist background and did not participate in anti-colonial struggles, as did the followers of Mao and Ho-chi-minh. They were largely intellectuals from wealthy families, educated in England, not workers in the field, much less freedom fighters. They were the fore fathers of our LLCT.

The distortion of our history has been done intentionally by many modern Indian historians belonging to the LLCT with the sole purpose of covering up historical wrongs against Hindus. They came to the conclusion that if independent India, fresh from a religious divide, and claiming to be secular, faced its past of Hindu oppression by the Muslim invaders, there may be a Hindu backlash that may offend minorities in the country. Also these minorities may not resonate with the older Hindu and Buddhist cultures of the country and may not feel the pride. The Indian mutiny of 1857 occurred because the British brought in aggressive and intolerant missionaries and had the country in the grip of a cruel economic exploitation. Yet such oppression has been left out of the history of India as told by the Europeans and the LLCT has not rewritten the record adequately. The destruction wrought during the Islamic period, which was worse than the British period in terms of religious and economic exploitation as well as genocide, has been similarly ignored or downplayed so as not to offend minority communities. So a false history was orchestrated to prevent the majority community from awakening from its colonial and religious oppression, fearing this would increase communal disharmony. The result is that our country lacks a genuine national pride and a sense of its continuity to ancient times. Even today our greats from Gurudev Rabindranath Thakur to Kailash Satyarthi are first discovered by the world and then by us!

The Left and left of Centre Thinkdom believes that by altering our history our present can be changed. They pretend that the generally cruel Muslim rule in India was benign and secular so that this account will serve to make modern Hindus and Muslims more benign and secular and help them bury the past. But the opposite is true. If a nation does not face its true history, it has no future and its present remains confused. And that is what we are today. That is why we have a Ram Janma bhoomi and Babri Masjid smoldering fission reaction, waiting to burst.
Only now the LLCT has been vanquished and the alternative thinkdom has annexed power. In recent years, the government of India and several state governments have decided to revise history books, particularly relative to the ancient period, bringing up recent data that calls into question the Aryan invasion and the many theories that have arisen from it. Over the past few decades numerous archaeological finds have been made throughout North India, considerably widening the civilization of the region and uncovering its continuity through time, rendering the Aryan Invasion idea obsolete.

Quite predictably, the LLCT in India is raising cries of tampering with history, and intellectual intolerance! History books are always being rewritten the world over and they should be, as new information comes in and our understanding of culture widens. This does not mean that history should carelessly be rewritten to suit an ideology, as in communist Russia or in Nazi Germany.  The accounts of history as written by the LLCT cannot be a sacrosanct and unalterable dogma. We will again raise our voice if we see mindless safronization, but right now the pseudo-intellectual left and left of centre history should be taken to the grave where it truly belongs.`

No comments:

Post a Comment